The source article says that
Literature, like other fields including history and political science, has looked to the technology of brain imaging and the principles of evolution to provide empirical evidence for unprovable theories.That's good news, since too often our grade level peers will argue that their subjects are more difficult to teach since they deal in hard, provable facts; literature, they argue, is fuzzy and subjective by nature and instruction and assessment of it is hit-and-miss at best. I tend to argue 1) that's not true, and 2) if it were, doesn't that make teaching literature that much more difficult?
If you, like me, are constantly trying to juggle the variables involved with reading comprehension, you might find that post (and the author's book) will challenge and broaden your thinking on the topic.
No comments:
Post a Comment